Specialist forensic delay analysis and programme advisory for infrastructure clients, employers and their legal advisers. Engaged where the commercial stakes are highest.
"The difference between a credible delay analysis and an unchallenged claim can be millions of pounds and years of programme."
On complex infrastructure projects, delay claims are rarely straightforward. Contractor-prepared EoT submissions routinely overstate entitlement, misrepresent the critical path, or conceal concurrent contractor-caused delays. Without specialist forensic analysis on your side, those claims go unchallenged — and you pay.
We work exclusively for clients, employers and their legal advisers. Our job is to establish the true delay position, challenge inflated claims, and give you a defensible commercial position — whether in negotiation, adjudication or litigation.
All work is delivered on a per-instruction basis — engaged for a specific purpose, on a defined deliverable. No retainer required.
We analyse contractor Extension of Time claims, establish the true delay position using SCL-compliant methodology, and produce a written counter-analysis that withstands scrutiny in adjudication, arbitration or court.
We assess the time and cost entitlement of NEC3/4 compensation events — scrutinising contractor quotations against defined cost, programme impact and contract procedure to give you a defensible accepted or countered position.
We review contractor programmes against contractual requirements and DCMA 14-point assessment criteria, identifying schedule risks, logic errors and quality failures — before they become delay claims.
Every engagement is measured by a single metric: did we protect or improve the client's commercial position?
Retained to forensically analyse a contractor EoT claim. Rigorous delay analysis demonstrated that the claimed delays were either contractor-caused, concurrent, or fell within float — defeating the claim in full and protecting the client from significant liquidated damages liability.
Challenged the contractor's EoT submission on the primary lining and SCL tunnelling contract through forensic critical path analysis. Demonstrated that the true employer-risk delay was materially less than claimed, saving c.£5M and 35 days of EoT exposure.
Forensically analysed the time and cost impact of c.300 change events occurring post-award, establishing a robust and defensible claim for additional client entitlement of approximately £20M.
BAFO Programme achieved top evaluation score across all 14 QSRA criteria — a result instrumental in securing the multi-billion pound HS2 Rolling Stock contract award for the Hitachi/Alstom JV.
We do not act for contractors. All instructions are accepted on the client, employer or legal adviser side — ensuring an unconflicted, independent position.
Forensic delay analysis and expert report support for construction disputes — adjudication, arbitration and litigation.
Associate specialist resource for forensic delay engagements requiring deep infrastructure sector expertise.
Direct instruction from employer organisations managing live NEC contracts who need independent CE assessment and programme oversight.
Independent programme review and delay assessment for project insurers and lenders requiring third-party assurance on programme status and delay liability.
Projects Resources is the practice of Martin Nwokoye — an experienced Project Management Professional and Forensic Delay Analyst with over 18 years experience delivering on the UK's highest-profile infrastructure programmes.
Martin has been retained by client organisations and Tier 1 contractors to own programme integrity, challenge contractor claims, and protect commercial positions on programmes including HS2, Crossrail, Thames Tideway, the Elizabeth Line and London Underground.
He operates as an independent specialist — engaged on a deliverables basis to resolve specific programme or commercial challenges. His track record includes saving clients multi-million pound EoT and liquidated damages exposure, recovering stalled programmes, and winning contract awards through best-in-class QSRA scoring.
All engagements are accepted on a per-instruction basis, with no long-term retainer required.
Engagements are structured to be fast, focused and unconflicted.
Brief discussion of the programme challenge, commercial context and required deliverable. Typically 30 minutes.
A clear scope of work and fixed fee or day-rate estimate — issued within 24 hours of the initial call.
Rigorous P6 analysis and forensic review using SCL-compliant methodology. Transparent and fully documented.
A written report, counter-analysis or CE assessment — clear, defensible, and ready for use in negotiations or proceedings.
Available for new instructions across the UK and remotely. Engagements can typically begin within 48–72 hours of instruction.